According to paragraph 2 of Article 56 of the Constitution, one of the central duties of the judiciary is "restoration of public rights and the expansion of justice and legitimate freedoms", which, considering the special duties of the prosecutors' offices, especially in the centers of the provinces, this task is pursued by that institution. It is verified and determined; This process or outcome is based on paragraph A of Article 1 of the guidelines for the supervision and follow-up of public rights in its conceptual form, "rights that are fixed in the constitution, relevant laws or other applicable regulations"; Therefore, the basic question of this article is based on the idea that whether it is possible to obtain a clear concept or a temporal definition or a temporal meaning from the presented definition of public rights in accordance with the theoretical or semantic foundation of the national consensus in terms of its scope and inclusiveness. ; And assuming the acceptance of this approach, on that theoretical operation and extractive process and field ijtihad in connecting the conceptual veins of the term "national consensus" with the legal phrase "public rights" are there any objective results and results? The initial answer is based on the judicial experiences in the field of public rights restoration in Sistan and Baluchistan province, and with the opinion of the written model in the provincial capital prosecutor's office, considering and including the central phrase such as "the rapprochement of religions", which is positive and effective in terms of provincial and national unity, and is a common method. In this article, in a descriptive and analytical way, with the approach of explaining the origin and destination of the revival of public rights in the context of It is a national consensus.